Home
 Wisdom of the week
Anti-racism
Prior restraint
The fading Constitution
An obsolete program
Following the worst examples
Law as thought control
Manipulating the public schools
Leftwing wisdom -- for a change
Immeasurable damage done to children
Guns and responsibility
Media deception
Paying the price
An upside-down society
Diversity and circular reasoning
The fragile Bill of Rights
More scrutiny of government, not less
A history not taught
Ambiguous "hate crimes"
Federal bureaucracies should not control our schools
To restrict, impede and prohibit government
Counseling blacks in victimization
Artificial states of Africa
Restricting property rights
Watch out for those new definitions
Politics or religion?
A symbol of honor
Bring back transcendence
Tell the truth in public
A new kind of mandate
Just who or what is the state?
Who are the masters?
Are you "anti-American?"
Suffolk proclaims Confederate History Month
Unheeded words
Focus on the real threats
Seeking racial numbers
Don't make the same mistake
The high cost of resisting government
A Mayor's welcome candor
Phony arguments
Real pilots and real guns
A reincarnated slave?
Reparations and victimization
Teaching everything but academic skills
Misinterpreting segregation
Keeping tabs on us all
Can you top this?
Constitutional safeguards
Giving the state more power over the family
Material progress like never before
Reasons for poverty
Let Augusta be Augusta
Back to neighborhood schools, "with all deliberate speed"
Just don't call them quotas
A problem if you make it one
The word not said
Sovereign united states
Tojo the Terrible
Religious charities as another government dependent
No glory in flunking out
Illusion of freedom
Taboo for you, but not for me
Another magnet for race hustlers
The public's voice does not count
USA, warts and all
A common cause
A ruling for the elite
Bad vibes from our Supreme Court
Empowering the drug lords
Dual citizenship
Putting the Bill of Rights on the sacrificial altar
Not enough money or love
Du Bois on segregation
Freedom and/or Security?
Wealth saves lives
Lackeys for a political machine
Boy Scouts under siege
The onrushing social cleavage
On the side of the angels
A blow to the Fourth Amendment
The nanny state out of control
Shedding America's historical distinctiveness
A poisonous morality
The war mindset
The coming invasions
Extortion in reverse
Pulling Africa back from the abyss
America founded and molded by settlers, not immigrants
Back to "black"
A Congress in eclipse
The people's greatest challenge
Unquestioning trust?
Dupes of designing men
This is not science fiction
Let the Flag fly
When nobody understands the law
Browning and Stevenson and Rossetti, et. al.
The practitioners of "diversity"
Perpetuating the pain
Besieged with P.C. from the left and right
On its way to the USA?
The greatest fiasco of the millennium
Indulging the moral urge toward war
Co-wives, step-siblings, and strife
Free speech still struggles to survive, in Europe and in the USA
 
Printer-friendly versionView Printable Format
Contact Issues & Views
(Also enter "Subscribe" to receive free Biweekly Updates)

America founded and molded by settlers, not immigrants

Wisdom of the week

[Reprinted from Issues & Views September 6, 2004]

Excerpts from Samuel Huntington's provocative book, Who Are We? - The Challenges to America's National Identity (Simon & Schuster):


In its origins America was not a nation of immigrants, it was a society, or societies, of settlers who came to the New World in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its origins as an Anglo-Protestant settler society have, more than anything else, profoundly and lastingly shaped American culture, institutions, historical development, and identity.

Settlers and immigrants differ fundamentally. Settlers leave an existing society, usually in a group, in order to create a new community, a city on a hill, in a new and often distant territory. They are imbued with a sense of collective purpose. Implicitly or explicitly they subscribe to a compact or charter that defines the basis of the community they create and their collective relation to their mother country. Immigrants, in contrast, do not create a new society. They move from one society to a different society. Migration is usually a personal process, involving individuals and families, who individually define their relation to their old and new countries. The 17th and 18th century settlers came to America because it was a tabula rasa. Apart from Indian tribes, which could be killed off or pushed westward, no society was there; and they came in order to create societies that embodied and would reinforce the culture and values they brought with them from their origin country.

Immigrants came later because they wanted to become part of the society the settlers had created. Unlike settlers, they experienced "culture shock" as they and their offspring attempted to absorb a culture often much at odds with that which they brought with them. Before immigrants could come to American, settlers had to found America.

Americans commonly refer to those who produced independence and the Constitution in the 1770s and 1780s as the Founding Fathers. Before there could be Founding Fathers, however, there were founding settlers. America did not begin in 1775, 1776, or 1787. It began with the first settler communities of 1607, 1620, and 1630. What happened in the 1770s and 1780s was rooted in and a product of the Anglo-American Protestant society and culture that had developed over the intervening one and a half centuries.

The distinction between settlers and immigrants was well recognized by those who led America to independence. Before the Revolution, as John Higham has observed, English and Dutch colonists "conceived of themselves as founders, settlers, or plants -- the formative population of those colonial societies -- not as immigrants. Theirs was the polity, the language, the pattern of work and settlement, and many of the mental habits to which the immigrants would have to adjust." The term "immigrant" came into the English language in the America of the 1780s to distinguish current arrivals from the founding settlers.

America's core culture has been and, at the moment, is still primarily the culture of the 17th and 18th century settlers who founded American society. The central elements of that culture can be defined in a variety of ways but include the Christian religion, Protestant values and moralism, a work ethic, the English language, British traditions of law, justice, and the limits of government power, and a legacy of European art, literature, philosophy, and music. Out of this culture the settlers developed in the 18th and 19th centuries the American Creed with its principles of liberty, equality, individualism, representative government, and private property.

Subsequent generations of immigrants were assimilated into the culture of the founding settlers and contributed to and modified it. But they did not change it fundamentally. This is because, at least until the late 20th century, it was Anglo-Protestant culture and the political liberties and economic opportunities it produced that attracted them to America. . . .

Excluding blacks, America was a highly homogeneous society in terms of race, national origin, and religion. "Providence has been pleased," John Jay observed in The Federalist, "to give this one connected country to one united people -- a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established liberty and independence." . . .

Large-scale immigration has been an intermittent feature of American life. Immigration did not become significant in absolute and relative terms until the 1830s, declined in the 1850s, increased dramatically in the 1880s, declined in the 1890s, became very high in the decade and a half before World War I, declined drastically after passage of the 1924 immigration act, and stayed low until the 1965 immigration act generated a massive new wave.

Over the years, immigrants have played a central and, in some respects, more than proportionate role in American development. Between 1820 and 2000, however, the foreign-born averaged only slightly over 10 percent of the American population. To describe America as a "nation of immigrants" is to stretch a partial truth into a misleading falsehood, and to ignore the central fact of America's beginning as a society of settlers.

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views


Printer-friendly version
Printer-friendly version

home | printable  

Copyright © 2010 Issues & Views
All rights reserved.
Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.
Last updated: Sun Mar 21 22:01:43 2010 AKDT

?>